Colonialismo de datos: repensando la relación de los datos masivos con el sujeto contemporáneo

Autores/as

  • Ulises Mejías State University of New York at Oswego
  • Nick Couldry London School of Economics and Political Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2123/virtualis.v10i18.289

Palabras clave:

Capitalismo, colonialismo, datos, infraestructura de medios, economía política, poscolonialismo

Resumen

Con frecuencia se dice que los datos son el nuevo petróleo. Pero a diferencia del petróleo, los datos no son una sustancia que se encuentra en la naturaleza. Deben ser apropiados. La captura y el procesamiento de datos sociales se efectúan a través de un proceso que llamamos relaciones de datos, lo que garantiza la conversión "natural" de la vida diaria en un flujo de datos digitales. El resultado es nada menos que un nuevo orden social, basado en una vigilancia continua que ofrece oportunidades sin precedentes para la discriminación social y la influencia del comportamiento. Proponemos que este proceso sea comprendido mediante la historia del colonialismo. Así, las relaciones de datos promulgan una nueva forma de colonialismo de datos, normalizando la explotación de los seres humanos a través de los datos, de igual manera que el colonialismo histórico se apropió del territorio y los recursos y gobernó a los sujetos con fines de lucro. El colonialismo de datos allana el camino para una nueva etapa del capitalismo cuyos perfiles solo alcanzamos a vislumbrar: la capitalización de la vida sin límite.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998.

Alaimo, C., and J, Kallinikos. (2016). Computing the Everyday: Social Media as Data Platforms. The Information Society 33 (4): 175-191.

Arora, P.. (2016). The Bottom of the Data Pyramid: Big Data and the Global South. International Journal of Communication, 10: 1681-1699.

Arvidsson, A. (2016). Facebook and Finance: On the Social Logic of the Derivative. Theory Culture & Society 33 (6): 3-23.

Bucher, T. (2017). The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms, Information Communication and Society 20 (1): 30€“44.

Cohen, J. E. (2016). The Surveillance €“ Innovation Complex: The Irony of the Participatory Turn. In Barney, D, Coleman, G., Ross, C., Sterne, J., Tembeck, T. (Ed.), Participatory Condition, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 207-226.

Cohen, J.E. (2017).The Biopolitical Public Domain: The Legal Construction of the Surveillance Economy, Philosophy & Technology https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2.

Cowen, D. (2014). The Deadly Life of Logistics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Davenport, T, (2014). Big Data @ Work Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

Dussel, E. (1985). Philosophy of Liberation. Translated by Aquilina Martinez and Christine Morkovsky. Eugene (Ore.): Wipf and Stock.

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality. New York: St. Martin€™s Press, 2018.

Fuchs, C.(2017). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. London: Routledge.

Fuchs, C. and V. Mosco (Eds). (2017). Marx in the Age of Digital Capitalism. Leiden: Brill.

Gerlitz, C., and A. Helmond. (2013). The Like Economy: Social Buttons and the Data-intensive Web. New Media & Society 15 (8): 1348-1365.

Gill, R. and A. Pratt. (2008). In the Social Factory? Immaterial Labor, Precariousness and Cultural Work. Theory Culture & Society 25, (7-8): 1-30.

Gillespie, T. (2010). The Politics of Platforms. New Media & Society 12 (3): 347-364.

Gitelman, L. (Ed.)(2013). €œRaw Data€ is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Greene, D. M. and D. Joseph. (2015). The Digital Spatial Fix. Triple C 13 (2): 223-247.

Haggerty, K. and R. E., Richard. (2000). The Surveillant Assemblage.British Journal of Sociology 51(4): 605€“22.

Hardt, M., and A.Negri. (2017). Assembly. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harvey, D. (2004). The €œNew€ Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession Socialist Register 40: 63-87.

Kitchin, R. and M. Dodge. (2011). Code/Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Las Casas, B. (1951). Historia de Las Indias. Vol. 3. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Lazzarato, M. (2014). Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Levy, K. (2015). The Contexts of Control: Information, Power, and Truck-Driving Work. The Information Society 31 (2): 160-174.

Marazzi, C. Capital and Language: From the New Economy to the War Economy. Translated by Gregory Conti. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Marx, K. (1976). Capital, Volume I. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Mayer-Schonberger, V. and K. Cukier. (2013). Big Data. London: John Murray.

Mezzadra, S., and B. Neilson. On the Multiple Frontiers of Extraction: Excavating Contemporary Capitalism. Cultural Studies 31(2€“3): 185€“204.

Milan, S. and E. Treré. (2019). Beyond Data Universalism: Towards Big Data from the South. Television & New Media.

Moore, Jason W. (2015). Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. New York: Verso.

Negri, A. (1989). The Politics of Subversion: A Manifesto for the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.

O€™Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. London: Allen Lane.

Postone, M. (1998). Rethinking Marx (In a Post-Marxist World). In Reclaiming the Sociological Classics, edited by Charles Camic. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality. Cultural Studies 21 (2-3): 168-178.

Rieder, B. and G.Sire (2014). Conflicts of Interest and Incentives to Bias: A Microeconomic Critique of Google€™s Tangled Position on the Web, New Media & Society 16 (2): 195-2011.

Ross, A.. In Search of the Lost Paycheck. In Scholz, T. (Ed.). Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge, 14-32.

Schneier, B.. (2015). Data and Goliath. New York: Norton.

Scholz, T.. (Ed.) (2013). Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. Routledge: New York.

Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Shepherd, T. (2015). Mapped, Measured and Mined: The Social Graph and Colonial Visuality. Social Media & Society 1 (1). DOI: 10.1177/2056305115578671

Smythe, D. W. (1977). Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory 1 (3): 1-27.

Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.

Terranova, T. (2000). Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text 18 (2): 63-88.

Thatcher, J, D. O€™Sullivan and D. Mahmoudi. (2017). Data Colonialism Through Accumulation by Dispossession: New Metaphors for Daily Data€. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (6): 990-1006.

Tronti, M. (1966). Operai e Capitale. Turin: Einaudi.

United Nations. (2012). Big Data for Development. http://www.unglobalpulse.org/sites/default/files/BigDataforDevelopment-UNGlobalPulseJune2012.pdf.

Williams, E. (1994). Capitalism and Slavery. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

World Economic Forum. (January 2011). Personal Data: The Emergence of a New Asset Class. We Forum. http://www3.weforum.org

/docs/WEF_ITTC_PersonalDataNewAsset_Report_2011.pdf.

Zuboff, S.. (2015). Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization.€ Journal of Information Technology 30 (1): 75€“89.

Descargas

Publicado

2019-05-20

Cómo citar

Mejías, U., & Couldry, N. (2019). Colonialismo de datos: repensando la relación de los datos masivos con el sujeto contemporáneo. Virtualis, 10(18), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.2123/virtualis.v10i18.289